I think he ought back to have understood that he would not have a leivilege
Mivilege
in Hory Koppych Le
knew was not allowed in
I.
X
Consideri
was
to led
I have imprised of too that. England? the Board of Heade of fini that they only
C
I do not co understand
Tak-1
letter – I think perme
communicated ! double l filluded to refer 15
to him the particulars given formen. letters of the is feft:
in one
(on 13913/80) + 146ch: 80 (on 18.717/80).
80
send copy without enclosures saying that when it would be quite afford to the reactive shrictly "observed in this Country to allow Mr Brewer to underta he leivate Surveys, & represhing Enquiry with the allegation that he fees from the Away
Rad received
an unmediate
Elat
rveys.
of ships conducted an
official exfacity,
J au
his
explanation
249
the statement he is allend
alleged
to have made that he had received fermission from the
frence to stated and receive these fees.
moge.
ark the fovense to inform the writers that their refresentation
bado hasbeen
tri
refund & the fovernor, Keough
مرح
whom it should have been frewarded as dicated in the Col Reg", for his refert, & repack and raily refly ?...
Breton
RM 10/3
Mr. Kingfull
Geet 4/3.
4/3
Dagren with M. Pearson - but Stend this to you
as Ilien you have dealt with similar cases als
$/10/3.
Mauritius & Malten.
PTO
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.